next up previous
Next: About this document

Spring 1997 John Rust
Economics 551b 37 Hillhouse, Rm. 27

PROBLEM SET 3

Classical Methods(I)

(Due: February 24, 1997)

QUESTION 1 Let tex2html_wrap_inline214 where Y is tex2html_wrap_inline218 random vector and tex2html_wrap_inline220 is tex2html_wrap_inline222 positive definite matrix. Prove tex2html_wrap_inline224 .

QUESTION 2 Suppose regression model

displaymath212

(where y, tex2html_wrap_inline228 are tex2html_wrap_inline230 , X is tex2html_wrap_inline234 , and tex2html_wrap_inline236 is tex2html_wrap_inline218 ) with normality assumption on disturbance, tex2html_wrap_inline240 . Derive the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of tex2html_wrap_inline236 when tex2html_wrap_inline244 is known, and show that MLE is identical to the GLS estimator.

QUESTION 3 Show that the Cramer-Rao lower bound, tex2html_wrap_inline246 , corresponds to the GLS covariance matrix, tex2html_wrap_inline248 , in Question 2.

QUESTION 4 Suppose following SUR model,

eqnarray21

where tex2html_wrap_inline250 is tex2html_wrap_inline252 , tex2html_wrap_inline254 , tex2html_wrap_inline256 is tex2html_wrap_inline258 , and tex2html_wrap_inline260 . Also suppose covariance matrix of tex2html_wrap_inline262 is tex2html_wrap_inline244 . Derive the covariance matix of tex2html_wrap_inline218 OLS estimator tex2html_wrap_inline268 , and show this covariance matrix is larger than that of GLS estimator, tex2html_wrap_inline270 .

QUESTION 5 Derive the maximum likelihood estimator for the model

displaymath272

where tex2html_wrap_inline274 are IID double exponential random variables with mean 0 and scale parameter tex2html_wrap_inline278 :

displaymath280

A.
Derive a formula for K so that f is a valid probability density (i.e. so tex2html_wrap_inline286 ).

B.
Derive the maximum likelihood estimator for tex2html_wrap_inline288 .

Hint: Show that the MLE for tex2html_wrap_inline290 is identical to the Least Absolute Deviations estimator tex2html_wrap_inline292 defined by:

displaymath294

QUESTION 6 (Bayesian) Suppose tex2html_wrap_inline296 in SUR model of Question 4. Suppose the prior for the parameters tex2html_wrap_inline298 is given by the product of two independent priors for the tex2html_wrap_inline218 vector tex2html_wrap_inline290 and the tex2html_wrap_inline304 inverse covariance matrix tex2html_wrap_inline306 :

displaymath308

Suppose tex2html_wrap_inline310 i.e. the prior for tex2html_wrap_inline290 is a multivariate normal distribution with hyperparameters tex2html_wrap_inline314 (the mean of the prior) and tex2html_wrap_inline316 (the covariance matrix of the prior). Suppose tex2html_wrap_inline318 , i.e. the prior for tex2html_wrap_inline306 is a Wishart distribution with hyperparameters tex2html_wrap_inline322 ( tex2html_wrap_inline324 ) and tex2html_wrap_inline326 ( tex2html_wrap_inline304 ). Recall that the density of a Wishart is given by:

displaymath330

Show that the posterior distribution of tex2html_wrap_inline332 is conditionally conjugate i.e. it can be decomposed as a product of a Normal and Wishart as follows:

eqnarray94

where

eqnarray103

Hint: Show that the likelihood function can be expressed as:

displaymath334

where tex2html_wrap_inline336 is tex2html_wrap_inline338 and tex2html_wrap_inline340 is tex2html_wrap_inline342 . Also use the fact that tex2html_wrap_inline344 so we can write:

eqnarray145

QUESTION 7 Consider the random utility model:

displaymath346

where tex2html_wrap_inline348 is a decision-maker's payoff or utility for selecting alternative d from a set containing D possible alternatives (we assume that the individual only chooses one item). The term tex2html_wrap_inline354 is known as the deterministic or strict utility from alternative d and the error term tex2html_wrap_inline358 is the random component of utility. In empirical applications tex2html_wrap_inline354 is often specified as

displaymath362

where tex2html_wrap_inline364 is a vector of observed covariates and tex2html_wrap_inline290 is a vector of coefficients determining the agent's utility to be estimated. The interpretation is that tex2html_wrap_inline364 represents a vector of characteristics of the decision-maker and alternative d that are observable by the econometrician and tex2html_wrap_inline372 represents characteristics of the agent and alternative d that affect the utility of choosing alternative d which are unobserved by the econometrician. Define the agent's decision rule tex2html_wrap_inline378 by:

displaymath380

i.e. tex2html_wrap_inline382 is the optimal choice for an agent whose unobserved utility components are tex2html_wrap_inline384 . Then the agent's choice probability tex2html_wrap_inline386 is given by:

displaymath388

where tex2html_wrap_inline390 is the vector of observed characteristics of the agent and the D alternatives and tex2html_wrap_inline394 is the conditional density function of the random components of utility given the values of observed components X, and tex2html_wrap_inline398 is the indicator function given by tex2html_wrap_inline400 if tex2html_wrap_inline402 and 0 otherwise. Note that the integral above is actually a multivariate integral over the D components of tex2html_wrap_inline384 , and simply represents the probability that the values of the vector of unobserved utilities tex2html_wrap_inline410 lead the agent to choose alternative d.

Definition: The Social Surplus Function tex2html_wrap_inline414 is given by:

displaymath416

The Social Surplus function is the expected maximized utility of the agent.gif

Problem: Prove the Williams-Daly-Zachary Theorem:

displaymath426

and discuss its relationship to Roy's Identity.

Hint: Interchange the differentiation and expectation operations when computing tex2html_wrap_inline428 :

eqnarray176

and show that

displaymath430

Question 8 Consider the special case of the random utility model when tex2html_wrap_inline384 has a multivariate (Type I) extreme value distribution:

displaymath434

Show that the conditional choice probability tex2html_wrap_inline386 is given by the multinomial logit formula:

displaymath438

Hint 1: Use the Williams-Daly-Zachary Theorem, showing that in the case of the extreme value distribution (8) the Social Surplus function is given by

displaymath440

where tex2html_wrap_inline442 is Euler's constant.
Hint 2: To derive equation (9) show that the extreme value family is max-stable: i.e. if tex2html_wrap_inline444 are IID extreme value random variables, then tex2html_wrap_inline446 also has an extreme value distribution. Also use the fact that the expectation of a single extreme value random variable with location parameter tex2html_wrap_inline448 and scale parameter tex2html_wrap_inline450 is given by:

displaymath452


and the CDF is given by

displaymath454


Hint 3: Let tex2html_wrap_inline444 be INID (independent, non-identically distributed) extreme value random variables with location parameters tex2html_wrap_inline458 and common scale parameter tex2html_wrap_inline450 . Show that this family is max-stable by proving that tex2html_wrap_inline462 is an extreme value random variable with scale parameter tex2html_wrap_inline450 and location parameter

displaymath466




next up previous
Next: About this document

John Rust
Thu Feb 20 15:38:44 CST 1997